Hacks / Solutions, Issues

CV19 asymptomatic overlap: still vulnerable, even 5 links down?

image from Pixabay

“Hypothetical case based on some reality:”  you’re doing OK in relative isolation, hardly ever go out except for essentials, but you know the household is still vulnerable.  Then someone ,”C,” a person who does visit you, has gone back to work, wearing a mask;  you know and trust “C” is mindful of hand hygiene.

But “B,” a  co-worker of “C”,  has also been back to work, and after a week finds out that “A”, a family member, has now tested COVID-19 positive.  That co-worker and that family member had worked together on a home project over the previous week, fitting the CDC definition of close contact (15 minutes within 6 ft;  also presumably face to face, with no masks, and “A” might have had mild symptoms).

So  “C”  had been with the co-worker over the week, and both were asymptomatic.  Late in the week, before the news about the positive test, another someone, “D” goes to stay at “C” ‘s home for a few days, overnight.  After that stay, “C” the potential 1st visitor couldn’t make a visit, but “D,” the 2nd visitor, came to your vulnerable household, “E”, wearing a mask, but at fairly close quarters.

If this were a chain, the most vulnerable would be the fifth link:  1)  “A”, the COVID positive person, basically asymptomatic when  exposing –>2) “B”, the co-worker, with possible asymptomatic exposure of–>3)  “C”, the 1st visitor, with the possible asymptomatic exposure of–>4)  “D”, the 2nd visitor, with possible asymptomatic exposure of–>5) “E,” the vulnerable  CareGivingOldGuy household.

Sorry for the bad graphic and sketch below, but blue (purple?) is supposed to be the asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic period, possibly infectious, while green represents the start of symptoms.  A test might be done then, with early results by then end of the bar.  Basically, it’s trying to show the overlap of asymptomatic transmission [yeah, I’m bad at spreadsheet charts and graphic editors!]

Worst case scenario: the virus has 100% attack rate even after slightest exposure; all five levels get the damn thing.  But the attack rate is not that high.  Attack rates reported seem to range from ~ 80% (that choir practice in nearby Skagit County) to ~50% in a church in Arkansas (both in CDC/MMWR) to ~15% in Chinese households, to even lower in Taiwanese households (both in Lancet, I think).

So……what facts pertain in public messages?  From the CDC (June 30, 2020):

“…The incubation period for COVID-19 is thought to extend to 14 days, with a median time of 4-5 days from exposure to symptoms onset.  One study reported that 97.5% of persons with COVID-19 who develop symptoms will do so within 11.5 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection….

…Increasing numbers of epidemiologic studies have documented SARS-CoV-2 transmission during the pre-symptomatic incubation period,The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 transmission due to asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic infection compared to symptomatic infection is unclear…”

For close exposures: “…It is important to remember that anyone who has close contact with someone with COVID-19 should stay home for 14 days after exposure based on the time it takes to develop illness….”

“Close contact” definition: Someone who was within 6 feet of an infected person for at least 15 minutes starting from 2 days before illness onset (or, for asymptomatic patients, 2 days prior to specimen collection) until the time the patient is isolated….”   Also, CDC on contact tracing click here.

From Old Guy’s point of view: 1) just gotta wait it out, or 2) if you’re lucky, folks will get tested.   “B,” the co-worker, seems important to test.  If “B” is positive, self-isolation is in order, then wait for the dominos to fall if they will;  at least “C” might get tested, and  actions taken to halt further transmission.
If “B” is negative, HURRAY! ….but don’t gloat…it’s like passing a pop quiz once, there will be more to follow!

image from pixabay